Frequently Asked Questions – Part II
(From May 4-10 Student Team Leader Interviews)
Our student interns put together an excellent and comprehensive competition summary document. A really helpful "in one place" consolidation of what each student team to successfully complete our 4 step entry process. Bring your magnifying glass, but well worth it: English Version — Chinese Version
Yes. When a team completes an entry (for one of the prizes and case study), the team will be asked to list its members and this is the list used for
awarding certificates and prize money. If there is concern beforehand, you may reach out to [email protected] and let us know. If possible, you should also make changes in F6S.com, but please recognize that the official list will be whom you submit for your entry.
Good question. Part I and II are focused on the solution (initiative) itself – basic background information and its impact. Part III and IV are your team’s
interpretation of its potential if it currently had more resources, and if and how it can be replicated and scaled.
View these four parts as a story to tell. You introduce the initiative in Part 1, tell us why it’s great in Part II. Explain how it can be even better in its
current location if it has more financial and local government support in Part III and then why it deserves to be replicated and scaled in many other places in East Asia and the world.
A good way to look at this question “if you team had the funds…..incremental results/benefits” is to first define what your team thinks is “maximum social benefit” based on what your initiative’s scope of activity. Would “social benefit” be best serviced by expanding the area served? Or if you did X and Y, would that significantly decrease the amount of plastic waste as a result? Ideally, as we laid out in the UN-funded report we wrote (https://bit.ly/PlasticCommitments2020), your team can look at the “magnitude” and “velocity” of what you propose to do and the money to be
spent. One can surmise that most of these initiatives are underfunded. Thus, put yourself in the shoes of the executive team.
First, ask yourself, what is realistically possible that our organization has to do to achieve this “maximum social benefit?” Even if we had unlimited budget, can we get this done?
Second, ask what activities that we can do would marginally increase the “magnitude” (i.e. impact of our solution) and also increase its “velocity” (how fast) given the proposed staff and money resources and time it will take?
Third, ask yourself if it’s a money issue at all?
Lastly, your answers (line items) of what you would spend and why will go a long way to “make your case” about this initiative. As you “make the case” that your selected initiative can be “replicated and scaled” how will it seem if you suggest a huge budget for maximum social impact, but the likelihood that an organization in another location could get this much money out of the gate would be deemed “slim or none.” Be realistic in the budget and the incremental gains that it can achieve – and that will make your answer much more powerful to the reviewer –and let’s assume, the local government that could read this Case Study. Sometimes asking for “less” and maximizing the “ask” is better than shooting for the moon and never getting the funds.
Not sure how to answer this question, other than to say that one should look at the time/effort/resources to spend to get the project completed. For example, beach cleanups are great, but the time/effort/resources required are massive for a one-time, one-off cleanup effort. On the flip side, many commitments made by world governments or companies typically state a delivery date of 5-10 years, always by 2030 when the SDGs are due –and
there are almost never any shorter-term project milestones to meet… essentially these type of projects are kicking the can down the road. When your team is thinking about what can be accomplished, be realistic in the time/effort/resources that will be needed/required and the completion date expected based on what your team suggests as possible. There’s no right answer. It really depends on the project and milestone goals.
This seems problematic as other teams will select case studies that are easier to describe, and with limited space (words) to answer questions, your team may find itself spending all its time describing what you want to occur, and your initiative would go from “proven/successful” to something that is far less certain. It’s hard to answer this question without specifics, but be weary of doing too much to change what the current stakeholder is doing well. Then again, be bold and if your team firmly believes in “product redesign” as the way to move forward, state what and why.
See the (directly) above answer to the question "Can a project….) and just substitute “merging existing projects” for “product redesign.”
A stakeholder can mean different things. For the most part, it would mean the organization most involved in the initiative –who has the most invested to make the initiative successful. I think, in many ways, the people/community are always stakeholders related to plastic waste initiatives that involve their actions, but, in general, ask yourself who is the organization (the stakeholder) most invested in the success of the initiative to happen
Also, are there other stakeholders who are essential to the success of the initiative? Do you need community involvement to be successful?
Do you need local government?
The question isn’t “should we only have 1 stakeholder” but what groups in the area are essential for the success of the initiative to
happen. Of course, it’s the initiative’s owner, but it may be others that are absolutely needed for success.
It’s now June 30th, and no word limit. We would appreciate feedback.
The competition is limited to initiatives in East Asia. That’s the whole point of the competition – to find solutions being done in East Asia with
success and to promote them to others in East Asia and the world.
All deadlines as of 12 May are final. There will NOT be any more extensions.
No, we do not plan to provide more information than we already have provided on the web site, and in the materials referenced, as well as this Q&A.
See Q2 as one detailed “hint.” Your team can go to https://cappindia.in and look at Season One of the Make the Case India competition and you can see the winning team’s presentations and case studies. The template was different, but truly when looking at all the entries, there were clear reasons
why certain case studies were selected and those that were not. That’s why it is more important to interact with the organization’s leadership about the initiative you select, pick their brains, and add your team’s views to “make your case.”
This is not something we intend to do. If a team has a question that they’d like to ask that absolutely has them in a quandry, i.e. they are at a
loss of what to write, they can reach out to us at [email protected] and we will reply by email and add our answer to this Q&A section.
Each case study entry will be judged by 3 reviewers from industry, academia within East Asia, as well as from around the world. To be more specific: Most likely professors, plastic waste experts, and environmental professionals from around the world.
Be more concerned with your answers, than who will be the judges.
From my experience in two seasons of the Make the Case competition in India, the teams that add relevant quantitative research typically has a
better understanding of both the problem and solution being offered. For example, saying “Hong Kong has a plastic waste problem, our initiative has a viable waste collection program and it should be extended to every part of the city” is easy to say, but better if you say something like “City ABC produces 3000 tons of plastic waste each year; our initiative selected focuses on waste from schools. There are 200 schools
serving 80,000 students and it is estimated they produce 70 tons of plastic waste…that’s the target the stakeholder organization is tackling” –the above numbers are totally made up, but the more you can support your answers, especially related to Part III as an example, the better your answers will be.
Teams that interview more people, and list them, should have a greater comprehension of the initiative they are writing about. That said, it’s up to the
team itself. You don’t have to interview anyone. We do recommend they speak to the leadership of the organization running the initiative if possible. Plus, perhaps any others they may recommend, especially potential beneficiaries of the initiative.
References refer to the backup research information your team finds to support your answers. The more references your team cites, the
more the reviewers will possibly see that your team did its homework. You don’t have to cite any references. Up to you.
1) For the first question, do we have to include a screenshot of the graphic that surprised us the most?
I personally think it's a good idea as the judges may not be familiar with the graphic –and there's no constraint on pages -just word limits.
2) For the second question, do we interpret the term "the best way" in the question as providing only one way to engage the youth or can we include as many suggestions as possible?
Interesting question. Hard to know what's best approach not knowing the graphic being selected, but if I personally were answering it, I would do my best to answer "the best way" and then also mention other ways. Be a bit bold. There's no wrong answer as it's your team's interpretation as to
how to get young people involved, and mentioning other potential options (perhaps with why you think these are good options) shows you thought through your answer and considered other options, too.
We fully expect teams to select an initiative they know about firsthand or within their country, although you can select from any country. It's up to your
team. Yes, definitely an advantage, but really that's part of the competition and I'd like to think if I were in a multi-country competition, myself, I would select an initiative from the US as it's my country and I'd be proud to show off something here that works to fight plastic pollution…. you still have to "tell the story" about it and "make the case" as to why the initiative should be replicated and scaled.
We don't have a formal notification plan, but will be reaching out to those admin/professors who helped spread the word about the competition —yes, indirectly is the best answer to give.
Absolutely. This is a learning experience for you and your team members. We encourage assistance, and that's why we strongly recommend you reach out to the organization that you'll write about as that's firsthand knowledge and insights that are priceless, too.
Regarding your question about XYZ Are they in East Asia? I went to their site and didn't see any evidence of such. From my viewpoint of watching the judging in our two India competitions, I can share that the student teams that selected more well-known initiatives and organizations had a more difficult time to tell the "story" – and that usually reflects less enthusiastically in the scoring by the reviewers. On the other hand, if they are somewhere in East Asia, you could create a story that they are a perfect solution at the right time, say for the ABC Country, for example — wherever you suggest –and tell the story that shows the judges that what you suggest could happen, then that's great, too. This is up to you.
From my perspective, I think all teams are better served to find a really great organization doing something very scalable in their local area or country, such as YOUR COUNTRY, where you may have more local knowledge of why it's working and how it can be replicated and scaled –and can get access to the stakeholders leading the effort.
From our experience running two similar competitions in India, the better submissions are those that literally "make the case" and tell a story about what
the initiative is doing, its impact, how and if it can replicated and scaled. Therefore, selecting an initiative with the above ingredients will be much better received, than there's a big problem of plastic waste in a large city and here's what needs to happen using ABC technology. I'm personally more of an advocate of "one small area at a time" and it sounds like that's what's happening with the initiative your team may select.
As far as permission, the nature of the questions in the template are more generalized, than specific, and we do not suggest you need to get permission, but likely not a great idea to provide any confidential information, either. Each stakeholder/organization has their own privacy concerns and from our experience in India, most stakeholders seem to welcome a student team peeking into their "successful" effort and that they want to bring attention to it
–only positive outcomes can result. But, please be careful if you think you do need to get permission, then it may make sense to select another initiative.
We hope to publish the Case Study of the winning teams, and would seek permission from the organization to do so, but again, just be careful if your team does talk with representative(s) of the organization that they don't share any confidential, sensitive info.
The PCC codes document provides a classification (or typology) of the types of initiatives you can write about in your Case Study. It is not a list of
real stakeholders or organisations that run a specific initiative, just a list of terms to describe the different types of initiatives.
PLEASE CONTACT US
Ocean Recovery Alliance
20th Floor, Central Tower,
28 Queen's Road Central,